Compare · head to head
NIB vs Ping An
Ping An ranks higher overall — 360 rank 99 vs 92.
Ping An leads on Value (82 vs 38), Growth (69 vs 63) and Sentiment (94 vs 59). NIB leads on Quality (93 vs 63) and Safety (74 vs 54).
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Australia | China |
| Sector | Insurance | Insurance |
| Industry | Insurance | Insurance |
| Size | Medium | Large |
| ISIN | AU000000NHF0 | CNE000001R84 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 92 | 99 |
| Value | 38 | 82 |
| Quality | 93 | 63 |
| Growth | 63 | 69 |
| Safety | 74 | 54 |
| Sentiment | 59 | 94 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | NR | NR |
| Cash Truth | 29 | 65 |
NIB vs Heungkuk Fire & Marine InsuranceNIB vs China Life InsuranceNIB vs AIA GroupNIB vs TowerAdd a third stock →
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100