Compare · head to head
Ping An vs Turners Automotive
Ping An ranks higher overall — 360 rank 99 vs 17.
Ping An leads on Value (82 vs 40), Quality (63 vs 41), Growth (69 vs 60), Safety (54 vs 35) and Sentiment (94 vs 36).
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | China | New Zealand |
| Sector | Insurance | Stores & Online Retail |
| Industry | Insurance | Specialty Retail |
| Size | Large | Small |
| ISIN | CNE000001R84 | NZVNLE0001S1 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 99 | 17 |
| Value | 82 | 40 |
| Quality | 63 | 41 |
| Growth | 69 | 60 |
| Safety | 54 | 35 |
| Sentiment | 94 | 36 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | NR | 57 |
| Cash Truth | 65 | 25 |
Ping An vs AIA GroupPing An vs Hanwha Life InsurancePing An vs Korean ReinsurancePing An vs Samsung Fire & Marine InsuranceAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Ping An · Turners Automotive
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100