Compare · head to head
Ping An vs Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance
Ping An ranks higher overall — 360 rank 99 vs 70.
Ping An leads on Value (82 vs 65), Quality (63 vs 15) and Sentiment (94 vs 48). Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance leads on Safety (86 vs 54). The two are close on Growth.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | China | South Korea |
| Sector | Insurance | Insurance |
| Industry | Insurance | Insurance |
| Size | Large | Small |
| ISIN | CNE000001R84 | KR7000810002 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 99 | 70 |
| Value | 82 | 65 |
| Quality | 63 | 15 |
| Growth | 69 | 65 |
| Safety | 54 | 86 |
| Sentiment | 94 | 48 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | NR | NR |
| Cash Truth | 65 | 66 |
Ping An vs AIA GroupPing An vs Hanwha Life InsurancePing An vs Korean ReinsurancePing An vs Lotte Non-Life InsuranceAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Ping An · Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100