Compare · head to head
Ping An vs The Shanghai Commercial & Savings Bank
Ping An ranks higher overall — 360 rank 99 vs 51.
Ping An leads on Value (82 vs 56), Quality (63 vs 15), Growth (69 vs 44) and Sentiment (94 vs 77). The Shanghai Commercial & Savings Bank leads on Safety (61 vs 54).
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | China | Taiwan |
| Sector | Insurance | Banks |
| Industry | Insurance | Banks |
| Size | Large | Small |
| ISIN | CNE000001R84 | TW0005876007 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 99 | 51 |
| Value | 82 | 56 |
| Quality | 63 | 15 |
| Growth | 69 | 44 |
| Safety | 54 | 61 |
| Sentiment | 94 | 77 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | NR | NR |
| Cash Truth | 65 | 83 |
Ping An vs AIA GroupPing An vs Hanwha Life InsurancePing An vs Korean ReinsurancePing An vs Samsung Fire & Marine InsuranceAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Ping An · The Shanghai Commercial & Savings Bank
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100