Compare · head to head
CNOOC vs South32
CNOOC ranks higher overall — 360 rank 96 vs 77.
CNOOC leads on Value (73 vs 58), Growth (54 vs 44) and Safety (78 vs 66). South32 leads on Sentiment (49 vs 41). The two are close on Quality.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | China | Australia |
| Sector | Energy & Oil | Materials & Mining |
| Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Metals & Mining |
| Size | XX-Large | X-Large |
| ISIN | CNE100005980 | AU000000S320 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 96 | 77 |
| Value | 73 | 58 |
| Quality | 63 | 61 |
| Growth | 54 | 44 |
| Safety | 78 | 66 |
| Sentiment | 41 | 49 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 78 | 59 |
| Cash Truth | 48 | 64 |
CNOOC vs Cosmo Energy HoldingsCNOOC vs OCICNOOC vs Iluka ResourcesCNOOC vs Seoul City GasAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: CNOOC · South32
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100