Compare · head to head
CNOOC vs PetroChina
CNOOC ranks higher overall — 360 rank 96 vs 86.
CNOOC leads on Quality (63 vs 47). The two are close on Value, Growth, Safety and Sentiment.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | China | China |
| Sector | Energy & Oil | Energy & Oil |
| Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| Size | XX-Large | XX-Large |
| ISIN | CNE100005980 | CNE1000007Q1 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 96 | 86 |
| Value | 73 | 71 |
| Quality | 63 | 47 |
| Growth | 54 | 50 |
| Safety | 78 | 79 |
| Sentiment | 41 | 43 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 78 | 47 |
| Cash Truth | 48 | 46 |
CNOOC vs Cosmo Energy HoldingsCNOOC vs OCICNOOC vs Iluka ResourcesCNOOC vs Seoul City GasAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: CNOOC · PetroChina
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100