Compare · head to head
NOF vs Taiwan Fertilizer
NOF ranks higher overall — 360 rank 96 vs 25.
NOF leads on Value (63 vs 33), Quality (64 vs 46), Growth (51 vs 33) and Sentiment (57 vs 43). The two are close on Safety.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Japan | Taiwan |
| Sector | Materials & Mining | Materials & Mining |
| Industry | Chemicals | Chemicals |
| Size | Large | Small |
| ISIN | JP3753400005 | TW0001722007 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 96 | 25 |
| Value | 63 | 33 |
| Quality | 64 | 46 |
| Growth | 51 | 33 |
| Safety | 70 | 67 |
| Sentiment | 57 | 43 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 84 | 24 |
| Cash Truth | 45 | 68 |
NOF vs SKCNOF vs DaicelNOF vs Hannong ChemicalsNOF vs Korea Petrochemical IndustrialAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: NOF · Taiwan Fertilizer
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100