Compare · head to head
NOF vs UNID
NOF ranks higher overall — 360 rank 96 vs 89.
NOF leads on Quality (64 vs 49). The two are close on Value, Growth, Safety and Sentiment.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Japan | South Korea |
| Sector | Materials & Mining | Materials & Mining |
| Industry | Chemicals | Chemicals |
| Size | Large | Small |
| ISIN | JP3753400005 | KR7014830004 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 96 | 89 |
| Value | 63 | 65 |
| Quality | 64 | 49 |
| Growth | 51 | 53 |
| Safety | 70 | 66 |
| Sentiment | 57 | 60 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 84 | 67 |
| Cash Truth | 45 | 31 |
NOF vs SKCNOF vs DaicelNOF vs Hannong ChemicalsNOF vs Korea Petrochemical IndustrialAdd a third stock →
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100