Compare · head to head
Bridgestone vs China Automotive Systems
Bridgestone ranks higher overall — 360 rank 100 vs 97.
Bridgestone leads on Value (71 vs 64) and Safety (82 vs 64). China Automotive Systems leads on Quality (73 vs 67). The two are close on Growth and Sentiment.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Japan | China |
| Sector | Cars & Auto Parts | Cars & Auto Parts |
| Industry | Auto Components | Auto Components |
| Size | XX-Large | Medium |
| ISIN | JP3830800003 | KYG2125H1011 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 100 | 97 |
| Value | 71 | 64 |
| Quality | 67 | 73 |
| Growth | 56 | 58 |
| Safety | 82 | 64 |
| Sentiment | 53 | 53 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 69 | 73 |
| Cash Truth | 66 | 72 |
Bridgestone vs NexenBridgestone vs Hwa Fong Rubber ThailandBridgestone vs Cub ElecpartsBridgestone vs Hankook TireAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Bridgestone · China Automotive Systems
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100