Compare · head to head
PAM Mineral vs Sanlam
Sanlam ranks higher overall — 360 rank 97 vs 42.
Sanlam leads on Value (66 vs 37), Growth (69 vs 17) and Sentiment (78 vs 40). PAM Mineral leads on Safety (68 vs 56). The two are close on Quality.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Indonesia | South Africa |
| Sector | Materials & Mining | Insurance |
| Industry | Metals & Mining | Insurance |
| Size | Small | Large |
| ISIN | ID1000161409 | ZAE000070660 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 42 | 97 |
| Value | 37 | 66 |
| Quality | 79 | 81 |
| Growth | 17 | 69 |
| Safety | 68 | 56 |
| Sentiment | 40 | 78 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 91 | NR |
| Cash Truth | 68 | 52 |
PAM Mineral vs Central Omega ResourcesPAM Mineral vs IfishdecoPAM Mineral vs VedantaPAM Mineral vs UsiminasAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: PAM Mineral · Sanlam
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100