Compare · head to head
JB Financial vs Ping An
Ping An ranks higher overall — 360 rank 99 vs 87.
Ping An leads on Value (82 vs 72), Quality (63 vs 52), Growth (69 vs 59) and Sentiment (94 vs 74).
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | South Korea | China |
| Sector | Banks | Insurance |
| Industry | Banks | Insurance |
| Size | Small | Large |
| ISIN | KR7175330000 | CNE000001R84 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 87 | 99 |
| Value | 72 | 82 |
| Quality | 52 | 63 |
| Growth | 59 | 69 |
| Safety | NR | 54 |
| Sentiment | 74 | 94 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | NR | NR |
| Cash Truth | 37 | 65 |
JB Financial vs Taiwan Cooperative FinancialJB Financial vs LiontownJB Financial vs MMGAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: JB Financial · Ping An
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100