Compare · head to head
iM Financial Group vs Ping An
Ping An ranks higher overall — 360 rank 99 vs 89.
iM Financial Group leads on Value (97 vs 82). Ping An leads on Quality (63 vs 22) and Growth (69 vs 52). The two are close on Sentiment.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | South Korea | China |
| Sector | Banks | Insurance |
| Industry | Banks | Insurance |
| Size | Small | Large |
| ISIN | KR7139130009 | CNE000001R84 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 89 | 99 |
| Value | 97 | 82 |
| Quality | 22 | 63 |
| Growth | 52 | 69 |
| Safety | NR | 54 |
| Sentiment | 90 | 94 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | NR | NR |
| Cash Truth | 14 | 65 |
iM Financial Group vs JB FinancialiM Financial Group vs UOB GroupiM Financial Group vs PT Bank Neo CommerceiM Financial Group vs Hana FinancialAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: iM Financial Group · Ping An
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100