Compare · head to head
Civitas Resources vs Western Midstream Partners
Western Midstream Partners ranks higher overall — 360 rank 96 vs 42.
Civitas Resources leads on Value (68 vs 58). Western Midstream Partners leads on Quality (73 vs 61), Growth (62 vs 36), Safety (59 vs 36) and Sentiment (55 vs 39).
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | USA | USA |
| Sector | Energy & Oil | Energy & Oil |
| Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| Size | Large | Large |
| ISIN | US17888H1032 | US9586691035 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 42 | 96 |
| Value | 68 | 58 |
| Quality | 61 | 73 |
| Growth | 36 | 62 |
| Safety | 36 | 59 |
| Sentiment | 39 | 55 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 59 | 85 |
| Cash Truth | 64 | 61 |
Civitas Resources vs Diamondback EnergyCivitas Resources vs Coterra EnergyCivitas Resources vs Prairie OperatingCivitas Resources vs SM EnergyAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Civitas Resources · Western Midstream Partners
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100