Compare · head to head
China Automotive Systems vs MMG
MMG ranks higher overall — 360 rank 98 vs 97.
MMG leads on Quality (83 vs 73) and Growth (66 vs 58). China Automotive Systems leads on Safety (64 vs 54). The two are close on Value and Sentiment.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | China | China |
| Sector | Cars & Auto Parts | Materials & Mining |
| Industry | Auto Components | Metals & Mining |
| Size | Medium | Large |
| ISIN | KYG2125H1011 | HK1208013172 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 97 | 98 |
| Value | 64 | 61 |
| Quality | 73 | 83 |
| Growth | 58 | 66 |
| Safety | 64 | 54 |
| Sentiment | 53 | 49 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 73 | 84 |
| Cash Truth | 72 | 82 |
China Automotive Systems vs Sanyang MotorChina Automotive Systems vs Holtek SemiconductorChina Automotive Systems vs TURVO InternationalChina Automotive Systems vs Apex InternationalAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: China Automotive Systems · MMG
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100