Compare · head to head
Chugoku Electric Power vs CNOOC
CNOOC ranks higher overall — 360 rank 96 vs 6.
CNOOC leads on Value (73 vs 35), Quality (63 vs 42), Growth (54 vs 46) and Safety (78 vs 13). Chugoku Electric Power leads on Sentiment (53 vs 41).
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Japan | China |
| Sector | Utilities | Energy & Oil |
| Industry | Electric Utilities | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| Size | Large | XX-Large |
| ISIN | JP3522200009 | CNE100005980 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 6 | 96 |
| Value | 35 | 73 |
| Quality | 42 | 63 |
| Growth | 46 | 54 |
| Safety | 13 | 78 |
| Sentiment | 53 | 41 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 21 | 78 |
| Cash Truth | 64 | 48 |
Chugoku Electric Power vs Origin EnergyChugoku Electric Power vs Tokyo GasChugoku Electric Power vs Toho GasChugoku Electric Power vs VectorAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Chugoku Electric Power · CNOOC
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100