Compare · head to head
Hua Nan Financial vs Ping An
Ping An ranks higher overall — 360 rank 99 vs 11.
Ping An leads on Value (82 vs 19), Quality (63 vs 26) and Sentiment (94 vs 8). Hua Nan Financial leads on Safety (64 vs 54). The two are close on Growth.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Taiwan | China |
| Sector | Banks | Insurance |
| Industry | Banks | Insurance |
| Size | Medium | Large |
| ISIN | TW0002880002 | CNE000001R84 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 11 | 99 |
| Value | 19 | 82 |
| Quality | 26 | 63 |
| Growth | 71 | 69 |
| Safety | 64 | 54 |
| Sentiment | 8 | 94 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | NR | NR |
| Cash Truth | 44 | 65 |
Hua Nan Financial vs Mega FinancialHua Nan Financial vs OCBC GroupHua Nan Financial vs Far Eastern International BankHua Nan Financial vs Mitsubishi UFJ FinancialAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Hua Nan Financial · Ping An
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100