Compare · head to head
Hulic vs Ping An
Ping An ranks higher overall — 360 rank 99 vs 62.
Ping An leads on Value (82 vs 65), Quality (63 vs 55), Growth (69 vs 53), Safety (54 vs 42) and Sentiment (94 vs 47).
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Japan | China |
| Sector | Financial Services | Insurance |
| Industry | Capital Markets | Insurance |
| Size | Large | Large |
| ISIN | JP3360800001 | CNE000001R84 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 62 | 99 |
| Value | 65 | 82 |
| Quality | 55 | 63 |
| Growth | 53 | 69 |
| Safety | 42 | 54 |
| Sentiment | 47 | 94 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 60 | NR |
| Cash Truth | NR | 65 |
Full analyses: Hulic · Ping An
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100