Compare · head to head
Bank of Queensland vs Ping An
Ping An ranks higher overall — 360 rank 99 vs 5.
Ping An leads on Value (82 vs 72), Quality (63 vs 4), Growth (69 vs 13) and Sentiment (94 vs 12). Bank of Queensland leads on Safety (63 vs 54).
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Australia | China |
| Sector | Banks | Insurance |
| Industry | Banks | Insurance |
| Size | Small | Large |
| ISIN | AU000000BOQ8 | CNE000001R84 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 5 | 99 |
| Value | 72 | 82 |
| Quality | 4 | 63 |
| Growth | 13 | 69 |
| Safety | 63 | 54 |
| Sentiment | 12 | 94 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | NR | NR |
| Cash Truth | 61 | 65 |
Bank of Queensland vs The Shanghai Commercial & Savings BankBank of Queensland vs PT Bank Neo CommerceBank of Queensland vs Jeju BankBank of Queensland vs Far Eastern International BankAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Bank of Queensland · Ping An
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100