Compare · head to head
Qualcomm vs Teradata
Teradata ranks higher overall — 360 rank 95 vs 65.
Teradata leads on Quality (79 vs 73) and Growth (52 vs 14). Qualcomm leads on Safety (62 vs 57). The two are close on Value and Sentiment.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | USA | USA |
| Sector | Chips & Hardware | Software & Internet |
| Industry | Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | Software |
| Size | XX-Large | Large |
| ISIN | US7475251036 | US88076W1036 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 65 | 95 |
| Value | 75 | 76 |
| Quality | 73 | 79 |
| Growth | 14 | 52 |
| Safety | 62 | 57 |
| Sentiment | 41 | 40 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 83 | 84 |
| Cash Truth | 62 | 74 |
Qualcomm vs Monolithic Power SystemsQualcomm vs Microchip TechnologyQualcomm vs QorvoQualcomm vs Analog DevicesAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: Qualcomm · Teradata
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100