Compare · head to head
HudBay vs Kinross
HudBay ranks higher overall — 360 rank 96 vs 90.
Kinross leads on Value (56 vs 48), Quality (75 vs 70) and Sentiment (53 vs 44). HudBay leads on Growth (68 vs 48) and Safety (76 vs 63).
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Canada | Canada |
| Sector | Materials & Mining | Materials & Mining |
| Industry | Metals & Mining | Metals & Mining |
| Size | Large | Large |
| ISIN | CA4436281022 | CA4969024047 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 96 | 90 |
| Value | 48 | 56 |
| Quality | 70 | 75 |
| Growth | 68 | 48 |
| Safety | 76 | 63 |
| Sentiment | 44 | 53 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | 83 | 80 |
| Cash Truth | 57 | 69 |
HudBay vs FQMHudBay vs Barrick MiningHudBay vs Santacruz Silver MiningHudBay vs Fortuna Silver MinesAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: HudBay · Kinross
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100