Compare · head to head
MS&AD Insurance vs Ping An
Ping An ranks higher overall — 360 rank 99 vs 16.
Ping An leads on Value (82 vs 74), Quality (63 vs 37), Growth (69 vs 34), Safety (54 vs 36) and Sentiment (94 vs 16).
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | Japan | China |
| Sector | Insurance | Insurance |
| Industry | Insurance | Insurance |
| Size | Large | Large |
| ISIN | JP3890310000 | CNE000001R84 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 16 | 99 |
| Value | 74 | 82 |
| Quality | 37 | 63 |
| Growth | 34 | 69 |
| Safety | 36 | 54 |
| Sentiment | 16 | 94 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | NR | NR |
| Cash Truth | 41 | 65 |
MS&AD Insurance vs Hyundai Marine & Fire InsuranceMS&AD Insurance vs Lotte Non-Life InsuranceMS&AD Insurance vs Korean ReinsuranceMS&AD Insurance vs DB InsuranceAdd a third stock →
Full analyses: MS&AD Insurance · Ping An
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100