Compare · head to head
CCB vs Ping An
Ping An ranks higher overall — 360 rank 99 vs 93.
CCB leads on Value (95 vs 82). Ping An leads on Quality (63 vs 38), Growth (69 vs 50) and Safety (54 vs 48). The two are close on Sentiment.
Ranks as of 2026-06-12 · 1–100 vs true peers. Higher is better.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Profile | ||
| Country | China | China |
| Sector | Banks | Insurance |
| Industry | Banks | Insurance |
| Size | Large | Large |
| ISIN | CNE100000742 | CNE000001R84 |
| Last update | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-02 |
| History | ||
| 360 (V1) since 2023 | ||
| Ranks | ||
| 360 | 93 | 99 |
| Value | 95 | 82 |
| Quality | 38 | 63 |
| Growth | 50 | 69 |
| Safety | 48 | 54 |
| Sentiment | 90 | 94 |
| Quality details | ||
| Profitability | NR | NR |
| Cash Truth | 60 | 65 |
CCB vs Bank China Construction Bank IndonesiaCCB vs China Merchants BankCCB vs The Shanghai Commercial & Savings BankCCB vs Jeju BankAdd a third stock →
Make Sense of the Ranks
Every rank runs 1–100 against true peers. Higher is always better.
360° View
1 · Watch OutGood· 100
Value
1 · ExpensiveGood Value· 100
Quality
1 · Weak FundamentalsHigh Quality· 100
Growth
1 · Tough TimesHigh Growth· 100
Safety
1 · High LeverageWell-Financed· 100
Sentiment
1 · SkepticismPositive· 100